tinyjo: (Default)
Once again, they're talking about Richard Desmonds donation to the Labour Party and I notice that there seems to be an assumption that pornography is a bad thing. Now I am not at all sure about this. I recognize that it can be exploitative but it isn't necessarily. Nor is it necessarily unhealthy - I tend to think of it as an aid to fantisizing for the unimaginative. Its not illegal so why should we not accept this donation as just another one from a business man?

Date: June 2nd, 2002 07:22 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] andypop.livejournal.com
Instant essay! Jo's post sure pushed your buttons (Sid James laugh).

You might even say they went "sponngg" (or was it "spunngg"? One of you SF experts is sure to know...)

Date: June 3rd, 2002 02:18 am (UTC)From: [personal profile] jinty
jinty: (Default)
spungg. And no, they didn't. Thank you for that timely image nevertheless!

Surprised it didn't push your buttons too & give instant essay -- but I gues you have other things to think about, like work. I was just watching old Buffy.

Re:

Date: June 3rd, 2002 04:20 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] andypop.livejournal.com
I was going to make a more detailed comment, but you'd beat me to it!

Profile

tinyjo: (Default)
Emptied of expectation. Relax.

June 2020

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated September 30th, 2025 06:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit