tinyjo: (Default)
Once again, they're talking about Richard Desmonds donation to the Labour Party and I notice that there seems to be an assumption that pornography is a bad thing. Now I am not at all sure about this. I recognize that it can be exploitative but it isn't necessarily. Nor is it necessarily unhealthy - I tend to think of it as an aid to fantisizing for the unimaginative. Its not illegal so why should we not accept this donation as just another one from a business man?

Date: June 3rd, 2002 02:18 am (UTC)From: [personal profile] jinty
jinty: (Default)
spungg. And no, they didn't. Thank you for that timely image nevertheless!

Surprised it didn't push your buttons too & give instant essay -- but I gues you have other things to think about, like work. I was just watching old Buffy.

Re:

Date: June 3rd, 2002 04:20 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] andypop.livejournal.com
I was going to make a more detailed comment, but you'd beat me to it!

Profile

tinyjo: (Default)
Emptied of expectation. Relax.

June 2020

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated September 17th, 2025 10:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit