Sadly, not so much :) We are overcome by yellow disease within about 3 rounds! It was the biggest loss we've ever had but it was fun in a kind of train wreck way.
Though I'm sure others have done it ... Pandemic with a Settlers mash-up. Each stage of development of Settlements influences disease transmission, and vica-versa for settlement development (lost labor). Early advantage for infecting the Robber. ;-) Port-to-port disease outbreaks.
I think balance can be obtained through a combination of first-infection advantage reduced by neighboring similar infections and multiple infections in that territory.
Instinctively, I'd want to give a rapid mortality rate for multiple-infection squares, but equally fast(-er) recovery. Theoretically, an early game disadvantage becomes a late game advantage. (e.g. Build that port city!)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
chiming
no subject
Date: August 6th, 2009 09:05 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: August 8th, 2009 01:29 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: August 7th, 2009 09:24 am (UTC)From:How many rounds was it?
--
Angharadxxx
no subject
Date: August 8th, 2009 01:29 pm (UTC)From:You Sooo gave me an idea
Date: August 8th, 2009 02:00 am (UTC)From:Re: You Sooo gave me an idea
Date: August 14th, 2009 08:38 pm (UTC)From:Re: You Sooo gave me an idea
Instinctively, I'd want to give a rapid mortality rate for multiple-infection squares, but equally fast(-er) recovery. Theoretically, an early game disadvantage becomes a late game advantage. (e.g. Build that port city!)