January 23rd, 2002

tinyjo: (Default)
Yes, it's that time again. Term has started up and so there are student productions to review once more - hoorah. Alex and I went to a set of 3 plays described as "dark, edgy and satirical" under the title of Bash. Well, they were dark and edgy yes, but not really satirical. Psychological and sometimes violent (descriptions of, not action) they were well portrayed and somehow compelling. I definitely enjoyed them.

The detail  )
tinyjo: (Default)
To Phillip Pullman, who has just won the Whitbread award - the first childrens author to do so! A brief word of warning though. The book that won (The Amber Spyglass) is book 3 of a trilogy - to start from the beginning read Northern Lights. They're fantastic books although I think Northern Lights is actually my fave. Check them out :)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/entertainment/arts/newsid_1776000/1776393.stm
tinyjo: (Default)
I found this...

A young violinist goes to see Itzhak Perlman. He plays his violin for Perlman and asks if he has the talent to be a great violinist. Perlman tells him to give up the violin.

Years later, the young man, now an accountant, runs into Perlman again and asks, "How did you know I didn't have the talent?"

Perlman says, "That's what I tell everyone. If you'd truly wanted to play the violin, you wouldn't have listened to me."

... in an article about why most web journals suck and it really struck a chord somehow. It's a principle which is applicable to so much. It's quite an interesting article although I don't agree with all the points - I think the writer is too focused on what the reader is getting out of it in some ways. I guess that's relevant if you want readers (which some people do) but I'm generally not bothered.* I guess the trick is to be aware that you may (and probably do) have readers you don't know (so don't post your phone number or anything) but don't worry about it. She also doesn't really mention the community aspects of journalling very much which is one of the things I like about it. On the other hand, it's not clear how old the article is but I'm guessing fairly (it says that in the days the writer started there were about 20 journallers, now there are hundreds :) ) so it must have been pretty different in those days.

*Actually, there is a feedback section at the end where she does acknowledge this, saying

Again, this advice concerns journals whose authors want their work to be read by more than a few of their friends. You may not care about anyone visiting your page twice, and that's okay. You may have a new approach that fulfills all of your needs but others find less appealing.

which is pretty much the impression I got. I guess you just have to be aware that other people *might* be reading it - you don't have to cater for them, but try to bear in mind that they're there
tinyjo: (Default)

Recommend to me

  • A book
  • A film
  • A band/album
  • A website
  • An LJ or other online journal (yes, I know these are also websites)

Profile

tinyjo: (Default)
Emptied of expectation. Relax.

June 2020

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated September 3rd, 2025 09:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit