tinyjo: (Default)
Have spent a surprising amount of time messing around this afternoon trying to decide why I don't just suck it up and pay for Flickr. In the end, I narrowed it down to a few things:

1) The link back policy. I find this annoying. Sometimes I want to use pictures in a purely illustrative fashion and don't want them to be a pointer off to elsewhere. I have a feeling I shouldn't be so precious about this but it's annoying.

2) I get that free users are a drain on resources, but surely by adding more sets, I wouldn't using any more resources than I already am, right? I get the bandwidth cap and I'm fine with it but the sets one is annoying.

3) Lack of customizability. Not a biggie (and something surprisingly few places have, as well) but I'd like to be able to lay out my page as I want it.

On the other hand, I do like the last-to-first aspect of it. And the uploader - last time I tried it it wasn't up to much but now it's pretty full featured and does all the things I used to wish it would do. If only ScrapBook was capable of doing last-to-first, I'd switch over and use that but no such luck. Within a page, yes, but over a whole album, no, not so much. V annoying.

Hmm. Actually, I might be able to fake it after all. This requires some consideration. I wouldn't have the commenting, etc but on the other hand, I never use that on Flickr anyway - I've never really engaged with the Flickr community. I guess I'm just not into my picture taking enough. Hmm. Thoughtful thoughts must ensue. Because I need a new LJ project, oh yes I do.

Date: June 8th, 2008 05:00 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] crschmidt.livejournal.com
To me, the difference is 'tags, tags, tags'. Sets are great, but tags are how I really find a collection of photos to share with friends. Want pictures of the house? "apartment, allston st.". Parties at the house? "party, allston st." Julie? just 'julie' will do. Julie at school? 'julie, school'.

etc. etc. The list goes on, but the way that I really go back and find a set of photos is almost entirely through tags, not through sets.

(Maybe Scrapbook has tags now... I don't know. I've never seen them, if so.)

Date: June 8th, 2008 07:16 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] tinyjo.livejournal.com
It does - it treats them as a special form of galleries but they're there.

Date: June 14th, 2008 06:17 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] twic.myopenid.com (from livejournal.com)
What he said. The one thing set do that tags don't is the ability to have a description, which i have needed exactly once.

-- tom

Profile

tinyjo: (Default)
Emptied of expectation. Relax.

June 2020

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated December 30th, 2025 09:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit