tinyjo: (Default)
Have spent a surprising amount of time messing around this afternoon trying to decide why I don't just suck it up and pay for Flickr. In the end, I narrowed it down to a few things:

1) The link back policy. I find this annoying. Sometimes I want to use pictures in a purely illustrative fashion and don't want them to be a pointer off to elsewhere. I have a feeling I shouldn't be so precious about this but it's annoying.

2) I get that free users are a drain on resources, but surely by adding more sets, I wouldn't using any more resources than I already am, right? I get the bandwidth cap and I'm fine with it but the sets one is annoying.

3) Lack of customizability. Not a biggie (and something surprisingly few places have, as well) but I'd like to be able to lay out my page as I want it.

On the other hand, I do like the last-to-first aspect of it. And the uploader - last time I tried it it wasn't up to much but now it's pretty full featured and does all the things I used to wish it would do. If only ScrapBook was capable of doing last-to-first, I'd switch over and use that but no such luck. Within a page, yes, but over a whole album, no, not so much. V annoying.

Hmm. Actually, I might be able to fake it after all. This requires some consideration. I wouldn't have the commenting, etc but on the other hand, I never use that on Flickr anyway - I've never really engaged with the Flickr community. I guess I'm just not into my picture taking enough. Hmm. Thoughtful thoughts must ensue. Because I need a new LJ project, oh yes I do.

Date: June 8th, 2008 05:31 pm (UTC)From: [personal profile] jinty
jinty: (hyperbolic plane)
Re sets - I would have thought this was more of a "come pay money and get neat features" thing rather than something that means that free users would drain resources. Both LJ and Flickr keep stuff that is specific to free users and I bet some of it is about marketing / premium use rather than technical resource.

Date: June 8th, 2008 07:15 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] tinyjo.livejournal.com
Probably. I never really noticed it on LJ because I was much more into the basic concept and community aspects of the site so I was already prepared to pay for that. I think most of those things here though are more that you just don't have access, rather than you get a bit and then have to pay to get more. I suppose I see something like galleries as being pretty fundamental to any photo hosting service so I find it more irritating - it's not just an add on in my mind but that may make me unusual.

Profile

tinyjo: (Default)
Emptied of expectation. Relax.

June 2020

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated December 30th, 2025 08:09 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit