tinyjo: (candid-opinion)
This, about the Sexual Orientation Regulations, made me really sad. All the examples the opponents of the bill gave, like hoteliers liable to prosecution for refusing a double room to a gay couple, were things that I thought "But that's what I would want to happen!". I think I may be a lefty pinko liberal.

On the other hand, this, about a new random radio station launching in Oxford, sounds quite interesting

sexual orientation bill

Date: January 9th, 2007 06:44 pm (UTC)From: (Anonymous)
Have to say I enjoyed this thread Jo. Nice to see you having to justify your statements. Have to say I think you can never change prejudice by legislation it tends to go underground and unspoken, and that in my lifetime people were willing to put up signs saying "no blacks,no dogs, no Irish". I suppose I think that if you're worried about who is going to use your services then your're in the wrong business, but of course you could always just say there was no room available. I having a law telling people what to think a good idea? - as usual I can see both sides of the argument.

Re: sexual orientation bill

Date: January 9th, 2007 08:32 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] tinyjo.livejournal.com
I think Zac's right that the American example is a good one her - civil rights legislation 40 years ago has really changed things - not all the way but significant progress.

Profile

tinyjo: (Default)
Emptied of expectation. Relax.

June 2020

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated December 31st, 2025 01:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit