The argument from Trainspotting -- was that a drug-encouraging film, or the reverse? I incline to saying that it discouraged drug taking rather more than anything -- it showed consequences in graphic detail (even before anyone got ill, the scene with Spud and his soiled bedsheets was pretty damn offputting!), and it showed how the innocent could end up corrupted (the guy who started off saying he would never take heroin and ended up dying of aids). Some people might argue that Trainspotting glamorizes certain aspects of the drug subculture (and quite a few of the main characters end up fine, with no overall consequences) -- but I would say that actually it realistically depicts how variable the outcome can be -- you can't count yourself in advance among either the damned or the saved.
I think this sort of message is a much more powerful and realistic message than either in Mary Poppins (everyone is already one of the saved, or nearly so), or LoTR/Harry Potter (in both of these, people have the chance to fall, and may indeed do so, but whether or not they do is very much to do with their inner characteristics -- it is almost determined in advance whether they will be one of the elect or not, even if we the audience do not yet know what will tip the balance).
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
chiming
Re: On Mary Poppins...
Date: January 16th, 2002 10:55 am (UTC)From:I think this sort of message is a much more powerful and realistic message than either in Mary Poppins (everyone is already one of the saved, or nearly so), or LoTR/Harry Potter (in both of these, people have the chance to fall, and may indeed do so, but whether or not they do is very much to do with their inner characteristics -- it is almost determined in advance whether they will be one of the elect or not, even if we the audience do not yet know what will tip the balance).