tinyjo: (Default)
Emptied of expectation. Relax. ([personal profile] tinyjo) wrote2006-06-16 02:45 pm

(no subject)

Does anyone know any webmail setups which have good interfaces, are fairly secure, have spam filters and are not gmail?

[identity profile] draconid.livejournal.com 2006-06-16 02:52 pm (UTC)(link)
No!

The best interface I've seen is the one at fusemail.com - although it's horribly orange and the newer interface tries to do a little too much ajaxy stuff (although you can pick between the two). I have no idea how good the spam filters are because that address rarely gets spam. And security wise, well, I've never had a problem there either.

The downside is it does cost money. I pay a very small amount because I had it when they had free accounts; I have no idea how much a new account costs.

The nice thing (I discovered recently) is that it does have imap and pop so if you want to be able to use it web-based and home based you can!

[identity profile] fweebles.livejournal.com 2006-06-16 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I can't tell if you mean "service which provides e-mail", or "piece of software you can download and install on your mail server which provides webmail". I know lots for the latter, and none for the former. :)

[identity profile] timscience.livejournal.com 2006-06-16 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I use Yahoo for my "public" email (i.e. the one that I use to sign up for things and which consequently collects a load of spam). My friends get the pop3.

Yahoo? Oh, it's....OK, I guess. The spam filter's trainable. The inbox takes a while to load. The new front page is more annoying than the old front page, but possibly that's because I'd got used to how the old one worked. WTF - it's a free webmail service, just like all the others. *shrug*

[identity profile] truecatachresis.livejournal.com 2006-06-16 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)
What's wrong with gmail?