Entry tags:
(no subject)
Now Las Iguanas is usually a resturant that I'm pretty fond of. I've even given them my email address, for goodness sake! So when they asked me to do a survey, I thought "Yeah, OK then." That's when I was confronted with this on page 1:

EPIC FAIL. I tried to go through the survey to see if there was a comments box I could rant into but no sign of one so I will have to email them my displeasure.
EPIC FAIL. I tried to go through the survey to see if there was a comments box I could rant into but no sign of one so I will have to email them my displeasure.
no subject
Any impressions we have that humans might have a wider variety of purposes in life than simply generating more of ourselves are clearly mistaken.
no subject
no subject
Words fail me.
Oh no, they've come back again.
Pragmatically I can see how someone might design this in a survey aimed purely at women - it would be a clear fail but sadly a not uncommon one. It's the fact that it's aimed at men too that takes it from the realms of the wrong into the downright surreal.
no subject
Yeah. I think not. *throws things in the direction of whoever designed the survey*
... I also love the 25-35/35+ dichotomy in question two, since which one do you select if you're 35? >_>
no subject
no subject
no subject
Go ranting!
no subject
I likewise am tickled (in a bad-tickled, irritating-particles way) by the age scale - 'Come to Las Iguanas, if you're over 35 you might as well be dead'.
Q3 should have a tick-box for 'grooming paedophile'.
no subject